CALL INTERRUPTED
Daytime Calls
The best time to call me most days is in the evening. I don't mind a first call in the day if the other person stays calm and confident. People work in the day and have callers.
The best time to call me for a long chat is in the evening. If I've gone out to dinner or to a meeting I like to chat after I've got back.
During the day I'm mostly talking to business people about mundane things. Or on the phone likewise.
Even in the evening I may be multi-tasking. But somebody who keeps me on the phone over an hour must be prepared for me to be multi-tasking and answering other calls.
Why should I cancel an evening out to talk to somebody on the phone? Why should I tie up my entire evening talking or typing to a man who has no intention of seeing me this week?
However charming he is, however much I fancy him, whether it's a first phone call or he's taking up my time three times a week, I'm going to interrupt my call or cut it short for Mr Average or Mr local, or Mr willing to take a six hour round trip drive to see me, if he is on the phone or likely to phone asking to meet me tonight, tomorrow lunch, dinner in two days time, or next weekend?
CALL INTERRUPTED
Some people are very possessive. The get angry if you want to end a call.
But they also get upset if you keep talking until you are interrupted. Even if you tell them the reason. In advance. And they believe it.
IM InterruptionsI had one man B who interrupted my long IM typing to a closer friend A. I left A for a moment to answer B. Then went back to A to explain I had another pop-up window. When I went back to A I got an upset angry message.
You may recognize this sort of message. It's the kind I've had before once in a while. They rant: 'That's what you think of me. I can take a hint. Am I so awful ... ? I won't waste any more of my time and yours ... Thanks for nothing.'
What's the point of that? Firstly, he's now upset me so I won't come back. I don't want drama kings.
I want calm, kind, sophisticated, confident, nurturing optimists.
He should assume that I like him as we have talked before. He should assume and programme me to agree that I would have talked to him if some other priority or emergency had not come up.
If the line goes dead it could mean that my laptop has fallen off the slide-out drawer. That my cable has pulled out of the wall.
That a spider appeared beside my desk! That a wasp flew through the window and is dive-bombing me.
That the postman called with a letter to be to be signed for. Or a parcel was delivered. I had to reach the door to answer before they left and drove off.
That something on the stove suddenly boiled over. Making a mess, wasting my food. Risking starting a fire - and I had to attend to it.
That my elderly aunt has just died. I've an incoming call from the hospital. I can't break off or I'll ring back and find they've gone or the switchboard can't tell me who called. Or her distraught daughter, my cousin, wanting to tell me what happened and aunty's last words. And when the funeral will be. She's dictating an address. I can't break off instantly. It would be heartless. Impractical.
I might not want to burden a stranger or a friend with all these trivial domestic details. Or the ins and outs of postmen and meter readers. Revealing my minor problems which might make me sound incompetent. Depressing family news should not be inflicted on some stranger who is ringing up to get away from their own problems.
The confident person always assumes that if you were friendly before you will be again. How do you know there is not an emergency? One of my friends was an the phone to somebody and the line went dead.
The other person had had an epileptic fit. Would they have been thrilled to come round and find their caller was not making polite enquiries as to whether anything was wrong and could they help, but adding to the stress and embarrassment by sending four-letter word messages?
THE BOOKING CALL
Some people won't talk to you unless it's a long time. They get miffed. They retort, 'Wait until you can spare me some time'.
And if it's a close family member or friend or business call why should somebody who has never met you think they should take priority?
It's only logical to give greater priority to a person who pays you a salary, pays your bills, sees you daily or weekly or regularly, rather than some total stranger who has never met you and might never meet you.
I like a confident person capable of leaving a sensible message on an answering machine.
If our call is interrupted or you get an answering machine you should have the wit to make a polite and cheerful reply. How do you operate at work and with the family?
If the time is not mutually convenient we could happily have a brief call daytime to fix a longer evening call.
Then in the evening I hope to give my new friend or potential date the attention he deserve in the evening.
I think warmth comes from tone of voice.
Yes, the emails and phone calls are tests of how the person will behave in a crisis. Will they add to the confusion and anxiety by being angry? Or will they stay calm and help and sympathise if you have a disaster? Will they find practical solutions? Will they be, as Diana described it, 'a rock'?
Do I want to be in business with this person, in a long-term relationship with them? Which man would you choose? That's how you judge others.
Now consider how they judge you. How do you react on the phone? The merely practical thing is to say: 'The line went dead. It wasn't my end. Do you think it was yours?'
The man (or woman) who is in absolute charge of his life and yours and the relationship, delivers cheerful messages with slight implied put-downs, but clearly carrying on the relationship in a stronger fashion, taking even greater control of you, the situation and the relationship.
What do you think?